The Sub Burndown

Saturday December 26, 2015



Section 1
- The Sub Fire -


6 Minutes With The Arsonist
Incendiary #1 — The timeline of initial events that sparked suspicion of arson.
Keep reading →
Fire Investigation Never Done
Cover-up of The Sub Fire started two days later…
Keep reading →
SLO City FD Failure to Evacuate
Clearing the building and ensuring nobody is inside - a crucial step neglected by the SLO City FD.
Keep reading →
No R.I.T. or F.A.S.T Crew Assigned
BC-1 Berryman not only did not assign a R.I.T./F.A.S.T. crew, he put his command post where the fire did eventually burn to…
Keep reading →
The Sub Fire Load & Interior Details
Store inventory and layout tells a different tale...
Keep reading →
Sub Roof Details
The Sub and SDRS had a complete recent earthquake upgrade...to achieve a one-hour Class A roof fire rating.
Keep reading →
Seven Paths To Enter & Fight The Fire At The Sub
The Sub was unique in how many ways it would have been easy to fight a fire.
Keep reading →
Burning A Building Down Is Not Firefighting
You can't put a structure fire out with chainsaws.
Keep reading →
Unknown Incendiary Device #2
Our assertion is that all evidence points to UID #2, having been ignited on top of The Sub.
Keep reading →

SLO City FD Failure to Evacuate

Clearing the building and ensuring nobody is inside - a crucial step neglected by the SLO City FD

Clearing the building of people is one of the most basic and important duties of firefighters and firefighter leadership when arriving at a fire scene.

In reviewing all significant fire calls since 2008, The Sub fire stands out as the only fire with no mention by any firefighter in any after-action narrative of checking for occupants immediately upon their arrival or at any time thereafter!

NO firefighter checked to see if The Sub was empty of people!

NO firefighter narrative mentions or claims credit for clearing The Sub building!

All staff at The Sub and Square Deal Recordings & Supplies (SDRS) have testified that no firefighter asked any of them about people still in The Sub or Square Deal at any time during the fire.

Did San Luis Obispo City Fire Department leadership fail to see if anyone was in The Sub or did they communicate with the off-duty firefighter (suspected arsonist) who disappeared after effectively clearing both of the buildings at the very start of the fire?

When the off-duty firefighter (who we believe was the arsonist) came into Square Deal, he was talking on a cell phone. We believe he was NOT talking to 911 because, at the time he was on the phone, it was before the first call on the 911 time logs we obtained. Who was he talking with?

No official firefighter checked at the beginning of the fire to see if Square Deal was cleared of people.

NO firefighter narrative mentions or claims credit for clearing The Sub building!

How did SLO City FD leadership know there were no people in the building unless someone spoke with the fellow (who identified himself as an "off-duty firefighter") and who we believe started the fire?

No firefighter narrative mentions or claims credit for clearing SDRS.

At approximately 2:30pm, Jose Nunez' relatives called SLO City FD to see if Jose was okay. Because SLO City FD did not clear the building or talk to staff standing out front of the fire, they did not know of his location and for about an hour were extremely concerned. (Jose was standing out front the whole time.) This speaks volumes to the fact that the building was never cleared of people.

Why did SLO City FD leadership fail to clear the building?

Why didn't firefighters ask staff (who were in front of The Sub) any of the following questions?

  • Are all employees, customers, and tenants accounted for?
  • How did you become aware of the fire?
  • Do you know how the fire started?
  • Besides the fire in the display windows, are you aware of any other fire in or around the structure?
  • Was there any fire, smoke, or other indication of fire before you vacated the building?

Basic information needed to make informed decisions — SLO City FD did not ask any of these questions and the firefighters who talked to Jose's sister and brother would have already known Jose was all right but they never asked!

These questions were not ever asked during the fire and most were not asked after the fire.

Section 2
- Square Deal Recordings & Supplies (SDRS) Fire -


The Sub Office Fire Proves Fire Did Not Come into Front of SDRS from The Sub through the Firewall Between the Two Businesses

The Sub/ SDRS Corp.© stands to prove the fire did not come into front of SDRS through the firewall of The Sub
Keep reading →
Unknown Incendiary Device #3 in SDRS

How did the fire go from The Sub to the front of Square Deal Recordings & Supplies when the fire was out in the portion of The Sub adjoining the front of Square Deal before the fire started in the front of Square Deal?
Keep reading →
SDRS Fire Load Notes

The SLO City FD leadership has repeatedly stated we had a huge fire load at Square Deal Recordings & Supplies. This is relatively untrue and totally untrue from the perspective of the two hours they had to stop the fire that was not yet in our building or prevent it from entering Square Deal.
Full document →
11 Basic Stop Points for Preventing Fire Spread into SDRS from Rear

11 basic stop points for preventing fire spread into Square Deal Recordings & Supplies from the rear (Pismo Street)
Full document →
Hole Map Illustration

Holes cut by members of SLO City FD and incendiary devices placed by unknown person(s)
Full document →

Section 3
- San Luis Obispo City Fire Department (SLO City FD) Issues -


SLOCF Fire Calls 2009-2016
History of success rate in San Luis Obispo fires.
Full document →
SLOCF Press Release Corrections
These are what we believe to be factual corrections to SLOCF Chief Garret Olson's press release…
Full document →
Bravest Act or a Cowardly, Evil Act?
Cutting holes in roofs is something firemen do but most civilians can't tell...
Full document →
Is BC-1 Berryman an Arsonist?
In evaluating the actions of Berryman, we have come to the following realizations...
Full document →
Total Destruction is a Job Well Done
Total destruction considered a job well done because no fireman was injured.
Full document →
SLOCF Fails to Follow Own Rules
We will state the appropriate rule from the current SLOCF manual and then what SLOCF actually did.
Full document →
SLOCF Underground "Burndown" Policy
SLOCF leadership seems to have an underground policy of refusing to go into buildings that are on fire.
Full document →
Is SLOCF Corrupt?
While none of these indicators singularly means corruption, a Fire Department guilty of most of these practices is certainly suspect, if not corrupt.
Full document →
How Can You Believe…?
Fire departments who fight few fires do not easily gain experience... There are three ways to deal with this…
Full document →

NEXT STORY

Read more




R.I.C./F.A.S.T. (Rapid Intervention Crew/Firefighter Assist and Search Team)

What is the significance when a Fire Department does or does not assign R.I.C./F.A.S.T. personnel during a fire?

R.I.C./F.A.S.T. = A fireman's best friend when firefighting. A R.I.C./F.A.S.T. are two or more firefighters whose sole duty is to wait outside an entrance that firefighters have used to go inside and fight a fire – Their job is to be ready to instantly rush in and assist if any firemen inside have a difficulty or an emergency. In the "two in – two out" firefighting rule they are usually the two assigned to wait outside to back up the two men (or more) inside.

Fact #1:

Unless R.I.C./F.A.S.T. personnel are assigned there can be NO interior firefighting!!!

Fact #2:

During The Sub and Square Deal Recordings & Supplies 12-hour long fire, NO R.I.C./F.A.S.T. personnel were ever assigned by BC-1 Neal Berryman or Chief Garret Olson.

Fact #3:

THIS MEANS NO FIREFIGHTER EVER WENT INSIDE TO PUT WATER ON THE FIRE OR ACTUALLY FIGHT THE FIRE!

Fact #4:

This means Chief Olson was intentionally lying to mislead when he said SLO City FD went into both The Sub and Square Deal and actually fought our fire. It also means the stories of valor he told to the media were also made up and false.


Fact #5:

There is no doubt, nor room for doubt, that Chief Olson is willing to lie in the ordinary conduct of his duties to claim heroism not deserved and to hide cowardice and incompetence that should disqualify him from the job.

In conclusion:

If SLO City FD was a "real" Fire Department, they would have just put The Sub fire out once the window box fire was out. Instead, they deliberately and methodically burned The Sub and then they moved the fire into Square Deal and destroyed it with intentionally set backfire. Both buildings could and should have easily and safely been saved. Square Deal should never have been involved!



Section 4
- Comments, Observations and Correction on Narratives by SLO City FD -


Preamble to Narratives
The overall situation with the SLOCF narratives is that they seem to be an attempt to cover up gross negligence, professional malfeasance, and cowardice…
Keep reading →
SLOCF Battalion Chief-A Neal Berryman
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Battalion Chief-A Neal Berryman
Keep reading →
SLOCF Deputy Chief Jeff Gater
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Deputy Chief Jeff Gater
Keep reading →
SLOCF Chief Garret Olson
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Chief Garret Olson
Keep reading →
SLOCF Captain Michael King
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Captain Michael King
Keep reading →
SLOCF Captain Mark Vasquez
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Captain Mark Vasquez
Keep reading →
SLOCF Captain Matt Callahan
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Captain Matt Callahan
Keep reading →
SLOCF Captain-Paramedic Station 3A David Marshall
Comments, Observations, & Corrections on Narrative by SLOCF Captain-Paramedic Station 3A David Marshall
Keep reading →