The Sub Burndown
Saturday December 26, 2015
Section 1
- The Sub Fire -
Seven Paths To Enter & Fight The Fire At The Sub
The Sub was unique in how many ways it would have been easy to fight a fire:
- Smash in through the old glass front door into the room beneath the area where the fire was burning and attack (this is the only path that is dangerous) — this would work, but not as good as other options.
- Walk in through front door, take five steps, turn around, and spray water through the 36" opening above the wall (yet below the roof) onto the burning portion of the store (without going into front burning portion). This was totally safe to do when SLO City FD first opened the front door 20 minutes into the fire or at any time 20 minutes before or after this point.
- 100 Pismo Street rear exit door has easy entry, in sight of front door - bring a hose in and fight the fire or stay outside and put out the burning merchandise from outside.
- 100-B Pismo Street door into beaded curtain room leads to a 6' wide by 7' tall portal into main room to fight fire safely from beaded curtain room side of a 20-minute firewall. The beaded curtain room never burned and was safe for most of the rest of both fires.
- Smash in through old front door into 283 Higuera Street and go through the all metal middle building and then fight fire in main room through a 36" wide doorway behind a 12-hour brick firewall. You can reach the entire interior of The Sub main room safely from the doorway behind the firewall and never go into the building that is on fire.
- Through the cut open door into the 283 Higuera Street bathroom, through the all metal middle building, and then safely through same doorway as #5.
- Through the cut open doorway to the 283 Higuera Street blacklight poster room through the middle all metal building and then safely through the same doorway as #5.
Section 2
- Square Deal Recordings & Supplies (SDRS) Fire -
Section 3
- San Luis Obispo City Fire Department (SLO City FD) Issues -
NEXT STORY
Intentionally Assisting In Burning A Building Down Is Not Firefighting (You Can't Put A Structure Fire Out With Chainsaws
Allowing a fire in a display window box to spread and consume five buildings is not firefighting.
Burning through The Sub's roof:
The fire was burning and venting out through the still open louver above the front room in the front portion of The Sub. It was also venting out the access hatch that had been opened by firefighters on the roof over the front room. The fire was also venting out the main roof louver vent so there was no lack of ventilation to limit an interior attack. To have the fire move into The Sub’s main room, SLOFD leadership put the fire hose through the center of the front door, opened up the roof, and put a master stream of water through the overhead opening in order to drive air to feed the fire on the underside of the roof. [see video: hose through door].
After 40 minutes (or more) of fanning the fire, SLOFD caused the fire to burn the rest of the way through the left portion of The Sub’s roof.
Burn all roofs completely seemed to be the goal:
The sequence of photos showing the burning of 283 Higuera Street makes clear that SLOFD put no water on the fire until the roof was gone and almost everything was burned. This seems to be SLOFD leadership’s policy. They let the blacklight room (283 Higuera Street) burn over 20 minutes before they would allow the two nearby hoses to put the fire out. When they did finally put water on the fire, it only took three seconds to put the fire out. [see video].
The metal building between The Sub main building and 283 Higuera Street, a former gas station building (not flammable) would not burn – SLOFD leadership broke all the windows and cut the sealed doorways in 283 Higuera Street to open it up for more air – but it was still not enough. They took a chainsaw to the Pismo Street wall and cut an 8’ vertical slash in the wall to better fuel air to the fire. The reason to add air to the fire appears to be an attempt at burning the metal roof.
SLO City FD leadership appears to have caused most of the damage!
If SLOFD leadership had never taken over our fire scene and had done nothing, only The Sub would have burned.
We feel that a single volunteer fire truck and crew, if allowed to fight and engage this fire promptly, would have had the fire out in five minutes (except for mopping up)…
If only a volunteer fire company had arrived at our fire, and we would have only lost the front portion of The Sub.
By encouraging the merchandise and back wall in The Sub’s main room to burn fiercely (with air blown in through the front door by a fire hose on spread pattern and the two draft holes above), the “fanned" fire burned through the wall separating The Sub from the poster/CD staging loft adjoining the main Square Deal Recordings & Supplies building. It came slowly as, at first, the piles of cassettes kept falling into the area where the wall was burning through while slowing it down.
All the extra air blown in acted like a bellows and increased that fire greatly, raising the fire temperature and causing it to burn through up into the cassette/CD staging loft behind SDRS.
Without the extra air blown in by the water hose through the front door and overhead master streams through roof openings, the wall between The Sub and SDRS would not have burned through. It took the continuous bellows effect of all the blown in air and total refusal of SLOFD leadership to put water on the clearly visible, easy-to-reach-from-the-outside fire (which was burning to the right of the front door) to cause the burn-through. (This was easily done even with a defensive strategy in place.)
The fire then burned along the underside of the loft roof and into the apartment at 150 Pismo Street (with the aid of a 4’x4’ draft hole cut into the apartment roof along Pismo Street). If the apartment had been defended from the exterior through the two windows only, the fire could not have gotten through.
Finally, the fire burns into the back of SDRS into the poster room. If a pair of firemen had been stationed to monitor this, it could have been stopped with a garden hose.
At any time up to 90 minutes into the fire, one hose spraying the back interior wall of The Sub through the 100 Pismo Street door would have stopped the fire dead at this firewall. Even an unmanned ground monitor in the 100 Pismo Street beaded curtain display room or rear door of The Sub would have 100% stopped the fire from ever leaving The Sub main room.
When Richard Ferris (owner) asked Fire Chief Olson to do this and explained why, he was again ordered to stop interfering with public safety and threatened with arrest.
An interior attack could have also been conducted by going into the cut open doors, or the front doorway of 283 Higuera Street (blacklight room), and putting water on any part of The Sub’s main interior through the 36" doorway behind a 13" masonry firewall – a totally safe location from which to put water onto the fire. This building did not catch fire until over an hour later. There was no effort to defend either small structure at 283 Higuera Street.
At no point during the 12 hours of the fire did any water get put on the actual fire burning on the underside of the roofs or any merchandise burning in the building.
If we could have fought the fire ourselves with no help or interference from SLOFD, we would have 100%, for sure, saved all of SDRS and most of The Sub – Buckets of water, sheets of plywood, and people who cared would have done way better than SLOFD leadership did!
SLOFD leadership is taking up the space of actual professional firefighters. Until leadership is changed, they will victimize other San Luis Obispo residents to ensure their own safety, and ease of job, while claiming credit and glory for work they did not do.
All the firemen knew it was a turndown:
Towards the end of the fire, when it was heading toward the comic locker, Ferris found a fireman who seemed to listen. Ferris explained the two-level nature of the comic locker roof – that it was a big refrigerator with ample cork insulation. Ferris further pointed out that the only way the fire could get to the building was along the underside of the dock roof which would be easy to defend even from outside the building. The fireman was very interested, then suddenly seemed to remember it did not matter.
The fireman told Ferris they knew everything they needed to know and ordered him back and away, refusing to speak further with him.
On a defensive fire, there is no reason to cut holes in the roof – Berryman declared it defensive from the beginning, so cutting holes in the roof is only to help in burning down the structure.
Communication with San Luis Obispo Fire Department personnel during the fire:
- The SLOFD personnel knew everything they wanted to know and would take no input from the start of the fire forward. They appeared to arrive with a burndown already decided, as there was nothing about the structure they wanted or needed to know.
- Every offer to help with much needed information was repulsed with arrogance and extreme authoritarianism.
- Only if they planned to burn down all five attached, but separate, structures before the fire started does this make sense.
- For over 30 minutes the fire only burned in the front upper part of The Sub. Other than initially dousing the two window boxes where the fire started, NO effort, no re-evaluation, no size-up, and no firefighter ever went into The Sub either to fight the fire or to evaluate fighting the fire.
- The command post was set up with no view of the fire scene.
- Quality Fabrics & Supply Company, next to SDRS, was never in any danger due to a 13" brick wall (5’ taller than the Quality Fabrics roof), a 9" block wall, and their metal roof. Instead of sealing the Higuera Street front door to save the inventory from smoke damage, SLOFD leadership insisted it be left open so they could save 30 seconds walking through Quality Fabrics building instead of around. They had full access through Quality Fabrics rear door so there was no need to damage Quality Fabrics inventory of fabric and foam. SLOFD leadership had zero concern for the damage they did to Quality Fabrics and no reason to do the damage in the first place. Carelessly using one side of Quality Fabrics roof as a walkway (when going onto SDRS roof was the same at either end) causing damage and requiring a new roof. In addition, careless water usage on the roof damaged the inventory. Quality Fabrics had to do a total roof job to repair the damage.
Section 4
- Comments, Observations and Correction on Narratives by SLO City FD -
- Section 1 - The Sub Fire:
- 6 Minutes With The Arsonist
- Full Fire Investigation Never Done - Arson Investigation Refused
- Clearing The Building - Checking to Make Sure No One is Inside
- No R.I.T. or F.A.S.T. Crew Assigned
- The Sub Fire Load & Interior Details
- The Sub Roof Details
- Seven Path to Enter & Fight the Fire at The Sub
- Intentionally Assisting In Burning a Building Down is Not Firefighting
- UID #2 on Top of The Sub Roof Corner A/B
- See How the Fire Moved Through the Structures
- Section 2: Square Deal Recordings & Supplies Fire:
- The Sub Office Proves Fire Did Not Come Into The Front Of Square Deal Recordings & Supplies From The Sub Through The Firewall Between The Two Businesses
- Unknown Incendiary Device Number Three
- SDRS Fire Load Notes
- 11 Basic Stop Points for Preventing Fire Spread into SDRS from Rear
- Hole Map Illustration
- Section 3: San Luis Obispo City Fire Department (SLO City FD) Issues:
- SLOFD Fire Calls 2009-2016
- SLOFD Press Release Corrections
- Bravest Act or a Cowardly, Evil Act?
- Is BC-1 Berryman An Arsonist?
- Total Destruction is a Job Well Done
- SLOFD Fails to Follow Its Own Rules
- SLOFD Underground "Burndown" Policy
- Is SLO City FD a Corrupt Fire Department?
- How Can You Believe A Fire Department Would Help Burn A Building Rather Than Save It?
- Official CityGate Report Shows Major Fire Department Problems that City Leadership Continues to Ignore
- They Train For What They Actually Do, BURN Things Down Fast and Efficiently
- Is SLO City FD a Corrupt Fire Department?
- Letter From City Manager Derek Johnson - June 12, 2018
- Letter To City Manager Derek Johnson - July 26, 2018
- Letter From City Manager Derek Johnson - August 13, 2018
- Letter To City Manager Derek Johnson - August 17, 2018
- Letter To City Manager Derek Johnson - August 17, 2018 (#2)
- SLO City FD Actual Firefighter Strategy
- Official CityGate Report Shows Major Fire Department Problems that City Leadership Continues to Ignore
- They Train For What They Actually Do, BURN Things Down Fast and Efficiently
- Section 4: Comments, Observations, and Corrections to Narratives of SLOFD:
- SLO City Fire Department Continues to Fail Our City
- Narrative: Battalion Chief Neal Berryman
- Narrative: Deputy Chief Jeff Gater
- Narrative: Chief Garret Olson
- Narrative: Captain Michael King
- Narrative: Captain Mark Vasquez
- Narrative: Captain Matt Callahan
- Narrative: Captain Paramedic Station 3A David Marshall
- Section 5: Case Studies (Pattern of Conduct):
- Section 6: SLOFD Firefighter Narratives
- Section 7: SLOFD Fire Investigation Report
- Section 8: Arson Investigator /Expert Letters
- Section 9: Firefighting Info:
- Section 10: Original Unedited Video Material
- Section 11: Original Photographs and Images
- Cesar's Photos
- Ethan B.'s Photos
- Drones Images
- "Katie's Friend"s Photos
- Neighbor's Photos
- Jim M.'s Video
- Jimmy T.'s Video
- John I.'s Witness Videos
- KCOY Photos
- Logan C.'s Photos
- Michael H.'s Photos
- Nicole and Kjerstin's Photos
- Shar's Photos
- "PRR"'s Photos
- Sara S.'s Photos and Videos
- Final Report Videos
- Section 12: Actual Firefighting Action
- Section 13: What Real Ventilation Training Looks Like